How can an LP test the strategy consistency of a first-time venture manager?

Test whether the proposed strategy is reflected in actual sourcing, decisions, portfolio construction, and support. A thesis can sound coherent while the completed investments follow a different pattern. Define the strategy's exclusions as clearly as its target opportunities.

Start with the decision

Map a sample of investments and passes to the stated stage, sector, geography, ownership, and decision process. Ask the manager to explain exceptions and changes. Keep a current strategy distinct from a prior firm's mandate.

The illustrative scenario

This is an educational workbook. The company or fund and all numerical inputs below are fictional. They are not ADIN results, customer claims, market benchmarks, or a forecast.

The fictional manager is raising a first independent fund after working on investments at another firm. The pitch includes several prior deals, but the LP has not yet verified the manager's role or permission to use those examples.

A prior employer's portfolio is not automatically an attributable personal track record. Separate sourcing, analysis, investment authority, board work, and realized outcomes for each deal.

Turn the scenario into an evidence decision

Consider a review of a first-time venture manager in which a confident explanation arrives before the supporting records. Start with the first question in the table. Write down what an answer would change: the next interview, the experiment's scope, a request for specialist review, or a decision to wait. A question without a consequence can produce a longer document while adding little understanding.

Next, inspect the record named in the table and record its date, owner, permission boundary, and limitations. Request a role-by-deal table, permissioned references, dated evidence of decisions, and clear realized versus unrealized figures. Keep unavailable evidence visible instead of filling gaps with estimates. If the record contradicts the explanation, preserve both accounts and ask which definition, period, or workflow differs. Do not silently select the version that makes the opportunity look strongest.

Finish with a conditional statement: if the specified evidence supports the claim under these conditions, take the named next step; otherwise investigate the unresolved question. Consistency does not require a manager never to learn or adapt. The useful question is whether changes are deliberate, evidenced, and compatible with the fund's commitments rather than retroactively fitted to available deals. This worked exercise is about the decision process. It does not assert that a fictional company has met a real diligence standard or that a template can authorize an investment.

Use this worksheet

Answer the questions with a source, date, owner, and next action. Mark an unknown as unknown. Use public or permissioned information and involve a qualified specialist when a question requires expertise beyond the team’s competence.

1. What opportunities qualify?
2. What is deliberately excluded?
3. Which deals demonstrate the process?
4. Why were exceptions made?
5. What has changed over time?

Questions specific to this scenario

• Which decisions were actually theirs?
• Who can verify the attribution?
• What is missing from the independent operating plan?

Request a role-by-deal table, permissioned references, dated evidence of decisions, and clear realized versus unrealized figures. Keep unavailable evidence visible instead of filling gaps with estimates.

A concrete next test

Choose one successful prior investment and one unsuccessful example from the relevant set. Ask the manager to specify their role and obtain permissioned corroboration. Compare the work shown with the responsibilities they would hold in an independent fund, including decisions not previously theirs.

Interpret the result

Consistency does not require a manager never to learn or adapt. The useful question is whether changes are deliberate, evidenced, and compatible with the fund's commitments rather than retroactively fitted to available deals.

Compare the proposed independent fund's work with the manager's actual prior responsibilities. Explain where the new role requires capabilities not shown by the old one.

Sources and method

These primary resources provide background for the concepts. The fictional scenario, calculations, and worksheet are ADIN educational examples; the sources do not report or validate those invented results. Reviewed October 11, 2026.

• ILPA: Due Diligence Questionnaire user guide
• Investor.gov: Private Equity Funds